<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dots News &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dotsnews.com/domain-name-news/category/legal/spam-legal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dotsnews.com</link>
	<description>Domain Name News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Strike Two for OnlineNIC</title>
		<link>http://dotsnews.com/domain-name-news/157</link>
		<comments>http://dotsnews.com/domain-name-news/157#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Naylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Registrars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OnlineNIC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dotsnews.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
OnlineNIC is in trouble with Verizon resulting in the largest cybersquatting decision ever. According to a Verizon press release, the damages are $33.15 million because of 663 domain infringing names. The Chinese-based registrar did not participate in the federal court proceedings, resulting in a default ruling, perhaps due to the question of whether or not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-161" title="onlinenic" src="http://dotsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/onlinenic.jpg" alt="" width="92" height="58" /></p>
<p>OnlineNIC is in trouble with Verizon resulting in the largest cybersquatting decision ever. According to a Verizon <a href="http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2008/court-awards-verizon.html">press release</a>, the damages are $33.15 million because of 663 domain infringing names. The Chinese-based registrar did not participate in the federal court proceedings, resulting in a default ruling, perhaps due to the question of whether or not Verizon chose the proper venue to bring such a case. If OnlineNIC has no assets in the U.S. then they may have little to lose from a U.S. court.</p>
<p><span id="more-157"></span>Verizon is not new to discussions of trademark infringing domain names. Domain Name Wire <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/24/verizon-wins-33-million-in-cybersquatting-case/">pointed out</a> the hypocrisy of Verizon bringing a cybersquatting case when they are guilty of redirecting URLs that infringe on others&#8217; trademarks.</p>
<p>OnlineNIC is also known as China-Channel.com and while their whois record lists an Oakland, California address, they have a Chinese phone number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dotsnews.com/domain-name-news/157/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
